I earlier reported (here)
that Stanton Glantz, a University of California, San Francisco professor, urged
the FDA to deny Philip Morris International’s application to market its
IQOS heat-not-burn cigarette as a modified risk tobacco product, based on his
comparison of lab results for IQOS users versus continuing smokers. I noted that Glantz ignored data for IQOS
users versus complete quitters, although that statistical comparison was not in
the documents released by the FDA.
Additional data released by the FDA yesterday
shows that PMI had submitted considerably more information from its Japanese
study. PMI reported data on exposure to
carcinogens, carbon monoxide and nicotine, and, importantly, analyses for all
of these results, including IQOS versus smoking, and IQOS versus quitting.
The following table shows all results after three
months. Differences in the table are
described positively with respect to health (e.g., IQOS significantly
lower). “NS” indicates no significant
difference between groups for that test.
The primary carcinogens are listed, with lengthy chemical metabolites
abbreviated in parentheses.
IQOS users were not significantly different than
quitters with respect to inflammation, oxidative stress, blood pressure, lung
function and carbon monoxide levels. Compared
with continuing smokers, IQOS users had significantly lower levels of 15 out of
16 carcinogen markers after 90 days of use.
There were no differences between IQOS and quitting for 13 of 16
markers.
My previous blog post was based on partial results
released by FDA. The agency’s latest
release provides further evidence that toxin levels three months after
switching to IQOS look more like complete quitting.
No one is claiming that IQOS is perfectly
safe. However, exposure to toxic agents
among IQOS users is substantially lower than exposure among smokers, and very
close to that associated with complete quitting.
In breaking news, the British Medical Association
Board of Science has just issued a positive report on e-cigarettes (here).
Their findings, which likely apply to IQOS, appear below verbatim.
Is
it safe to use an e-cigarette in the long-term?
In
the absence of long-term studies it is not possible to be certain about the
long-term health risks, but there is growing consensus that use of e-cigarettes
is significantly safer than smoking.
Unlike
cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use does not expose users to the products of
combustion, and most of the toxicants causing smoking-related disease are
absent or significantly reduced in e-cigarette vapour.
Indications
to date are that complete switching can lead to improvements in the levels of
toxins and carcinogens in urine similar to that in smokers who switch
completely to NRT (nicotine replacement therapies).
Comparison of Laboratory Values: IQOS Users Versus Continuing Smokers and Versus Complete Quitters After 3 Months | ||
---|---|---|
Lab Marker | IQOS Versus Smoking | IQOS Versus Complete Quitting* |
Inflammation | ||
White blood cell count | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
C-reactive protein | NS | NS |
Soluble ICAM | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Fibrinogen | NS | NS |
Oxidative Stress | ||
Prostaglandin F2 alpha | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
11-DTX-B2 | NS | NS |
Cholesterol, Triglycerides | ||
High density lipoprotein | IQOS significantly higher | NS |
Low density lipoprotein | NS | NS |
Total cholesterol | NS | NS |
Triglycerides | NS | IQOS significantly lower |
Blood pressure | ||
Systolic | NS | NS |
Diastolic | NS | NS |
Lung function | ||
Forced expiratory vol, 1 sec. | NS | NS |
Carbon monoxide | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Carboxyhemoglobin | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Nicotine | NS* | IQOS significantly higher |
Carcinogens** | ||
Nicotine-derived nitrosamine ketone (NNK) | IQOS significantly lower | Quitting significantly lower |
Butadiene (MHBMA) | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Acrolein (3-HPMA) | IQOS significantly lower | Quitting significantly lower |
Acrolein (HMPMA) | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Benzene (S-PMA) | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (1-OHP) | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (CYP 1A2) | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
N-nitrosonornicotine | IQOS significantly lower | Quitting significantly lower |
4-aminobiphenyl | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
1-aminonaphthalene | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
2-aminonaphthalene | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
o-toluidine | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Acrylonitrile (CEMA) | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Styrene (HEMA) | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Benzo(a)pyrene | IQOS significantly lower | NS |
Toluene (S-BMA) | NS | NS |
NS, No significant difference
* IQOS results in nicotine levels that are similar
to smoking
** carcinogen (chemical metabolites)
2 comments:
Do you have the primary source on the FDA latest release. That is "The agency’s latest release provides further evidence that toxin levels three months after switching to IQOS look more like complete quitting". Thanks
The FDA website contains enormous amounts of information and is very difficult to navigate. After much investigation I found the information, but it does not have an accessible link. So I make the specific report that is the source of this blog available here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hwxwRFYNYVoyApljayXvRVU03nNnBdpa/view?usp=sharing
Brad Rodu
Post a Comment