Mass media are in complete denial of the voluminous
scientific literature supporting e-cigarettes as harm-reduction products. A recent report on National Public Radio
(here) is representative. The host set up the
story in classic fashion, pitting “expert” harm reduction naysayers against lay e-cigarette
users, store owners and marketers. The
argument was settled before it began.
Are the media unable to find tobacco research and policy
experts who support e-cigarettes and tobacco harm reduction? Although we are relatively few, we are widely
published and highly visible – testifying, editorializing, providing interviews
when invited. Independent and articulate
authorities on tobacco harm reduction in the U.S. include:
Carl Phillips from Consumer Advocates for Smoke Free
Alternatives (here)
Michael Siegel at Boston University (here)
Joel Nitzkin at R Street (here)
Gil Ross at the American Council on Science and Health (here)
Jeff Stier at the National Center for Public Policy Research
(here)
Tobacco harm reduction is a worldwide phenomenon, and it deserves balanced and judicious media coverage. Journalists, start with this list.
Note: Updated October 28, 2013.
Lynn Kozlowski, Dean of the School of Public Health and
Health Professions, the University at Buffalo (here)
Bill Godshall at Smokefree Pennsylvania
International experts include:
David Sweanor (here) in Canada
Karl Erik Lund (here) in Norway
Riccardo Polosa (interviewed here) and Pasquale Caponnetto in Italy
Tobacco harm reduction is a worldwide phenomenon, and it deserves balanced and judicious media coverage. Journalists, start with this list.
Note: Updated October 28, 2013.
1 comment:
I suggest to also add Jean-François Etter (Switzerland), Philippe Presles (France), Gérard Matern (France) and Jacques Lehouezec (France)
Post a Comment