Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

Poison Control Centers' Data Puts E-Cigarette Exposure Risk in Perspective


The journal Pediatrics recently reported that “there were more than 8,200 calls to US poison centers regarding exposures to liquid nicotine and e-cigarettes among children younger than 6 years of age from January 2012 through April 2017, averaging 129 calls each month or more than 4 a day.” (here) As I previously noted (here), annual exposures (which were 1,548 according to the Pediatrics article) should be considered in appropriate perspective. 

While the journal article acknowledged that e-cigarette exposures “decreased by about 20% from 2015 to 2016,” its senior author called for additional regulation.  If children’s exposure to products should guide regulatory priorities, the following chart from the American Association of Poison Control Centers (2016 report available here) may be instructive.

Non-Pharmaceutical Exposures Reported To Poison Control Centers in the U.S., 2016




Product CategoryNumber Among Children Under 6 YearsNumber Among All AgesDeaths Per 100,000 Exposures*




Cosmetics, personal care products136,004180,0653
Household cleaners111,445179,82813
Foreign bodies65,86490,6671
Pesticides33,45877,57322
Plants27,56545,15024
Arts, crafts, office supplies20,09627,3190
Deodorizers17,39821,26614
Essential oils (clove, etc.)13,26418,9970
Tobacco11,35813,3190
Cigarettes6,3316,699--
E-Cigarettes2,0752,827--
Chewing tobacco1,2201,357--
Other1,7322,436--
Foods, additives, spoilage10,83933,9099
Alcohols9,56222,289117
Chemicals9,32833,91080
Gasoline, other hydrocarbons8,82127,80776
Bites, venom6,70846,98915
Paint, strippers6,60112,2380
Batteries5,4839,65141
Adhesives, glue4,6929,6220
Fumes, vapors3,67331,337214
Fertilizers2,7594,59080
Other35,85994,02444




All540,777980,55026

* All Ages

Of the half million exposures among children under 6 years of age recorded by poison control centers in 2016, 45.8% involved cosmetics, personal care products or household cleaners, while e-cigarettes accounted for just 0.4%. 

Looking at product-related deaths per 100,000 exposures, rates were highest for fumes and vapors (which included carbon monoxide) and for alcohols, but there were no deaths recorded for tobacco exposures, including e-cigarettes.

Public health generally and children’s health in particular may benefit from regulatory reform that is keyed to demonstrated risk exposure.



Thursday, April 16, 2015

Reality Bites the Dust in New Smokeless Tobacco Study



It’s surprising what passes for “science” in some journals today.  Chemical Research in Toxicology has published a study from the University of California’s Berkeley and San Francisco campuses making this extraordinary claim: “Children living with smokeless tobacco [ST] users may be exposed to carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines [TSNAs] via contact with contaminated dust and household surfaces.”

The research was an offshoot from a larger effort looking for an environmental cause of childhood leukemia.  Families who participated in the study were divided into three groups: non-users of tobacco, smokers and ST users.  The contents of dust bags from their household vacuum cleaners were analyzed for NNN and NNK, two TSNAs that are considered to be causes of cancer.

Almost every household – even those with no tobacco users – had NNN and NNK in their dust, but researchers found “higher” levels of these agents in every gram of dust from an ST home – about 5 to 10 nanograms.  Keep in mind that a nanogram is one billionth of a gram, and a gram is less than four one-hundredths of an ounce. 

Each gram of moist snuff contains about 5-10 micrograms of NNN/NNK, about 1,000 times higher than the dust in this study (see my previous blog entry).  At one can a day (32 grams), the typical ST user is exposed to 32,000 times more NNN and NNK than the hypothetical child who eats a gram of dust every day.  It is well established that long-term use of ST even at that level is not associated with a significant increase in risk for ANY cancer.      

The California exposure data may be accurate, but the findings are of no practical consequence, other than to serve as fodder for hyperbolic anti-tobacco claims.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Poisoning Public Health Issues: Chapter 2



Three years ago I discussed an unfounded claim by Harvard University’s Dr. Gregory Connolly that smokeless tobacco products are a major cause of poisoning among American children (here).  A recent press release from the Kentucky Regional Poison Control Center (here) has a similar ring, with the headline, “E-cigarettes cause alarming increase in calls to poison control center.”  The center based its claim on the fact that it received 39 calls in 2013, compared to nine in 2012. 

In context, the figures pack none of the headline’s punch.

At my request, the Center provided some additional information:

“24 of the 39 cases are exposures to children (less than 6 years)… Most exposures were small and did not lead to symptoms.  Those individuals that did develop symptoms were monitored at home by the [Kentucky Regional Poison Control Center] through follow-up calls.  Only two patients were recommended to go to the emergency department: 1 dermal exposure and 1 ingestion.  Both patients saw symptom resolution in less than 8 hours.”

To place the Kentucky e-cigarette poison alert in focus, I reviewed the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ latest (2012) report (read it here). 

It turns out that tobacco products accounted for only about 1.3% of the over 581,000 cases of exposure to non-pharmaceutical agents of all kinds in children less than 6 years of age in 2012. That’s 7,480 cases. Here’s a table of some of the more common exposures:



Non-pharmaceutical Exposure Cases Among Children Under 6 Years Old, 2012
Product CategoryNumber of Exposures
Cosmetics and personal care products156,623
Household cleaners106,582
Foreign bodies77,905
Pesticides36,056
Plants30,690
Arts, crafts, office supplies21,146
Deodorizers19,153
Alcohols11,443
Gasoline, other hydrocarbons10,572
Food additives, spoilage10,547
Bites, venom8,777
Tobacco products7,480
Essential Oils (clove, etc)7,446
Paint, paint strippers7,192
Adhesives, glue5,863
Batteries5,116
Chemicals3,923
Fertilizers3,054
Everything else51,351
Total580,919
 


Of the tobacco product exposures, cigarettes were the most common, at 53%, while smokeless products accounted for 16%.  Only 172 incidents (2%) involved e-cigarettes.

Many consumer products pose potential danger, especially to young children.  However, when put into perspective with exposures to cosmetics, household cleaners, paint and paint strippers and fertilizers, the selective reporting of poison control information about e-cigarettes is meaningless.