Last week I called for retraction of a flawed study by
University of California San Francisco’s Benjamin W. Chaffee, Shannon Lea
Watkins and Stanton A. Glantz that appeared in the journal Pediatrics (here
and here).
Once again using the FDA Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey,
the same authors exaggerated the gateway effect of e-cigarettes, hookah and
smokeless tobacco in a January JAMA
Pediatrics article (here). I criticized at that time the omission of
information that would have provided context for their findings (here). The exaggerations were amplified in the media.
In an interview with National Public Radio (here),
Dr. Watkins failed to note the minuscule numbers used in her study to support
the gateway claim. I have inserted those
numbers in bold in her quote, here:
“We found that kids who tried e-cigarettes [n=11] or hookah [n=8] or smokeless tobacco [n=3]
or cigars [n=7] – any noncigarette
tobacco product – were all twice as likely to try cigarettes a year later
compared to kids who hadn’t used any of those other tobacco products [n=175]. Kids who were using two or more noncigarette
products [n=15] were four times as
likely to report using cigarettes a year later.” (I have confirmed these
numbers in the FDA data; they are in the table below)
Dr. Watkins added the extraordinary claim that trying one
tobacco product changes one’s perception of cigarettes: “Using these products
might change a kid’s perception of the harm of cigarettes, and so they are
perceived as less dangerous and they get used to using tobacco and so using
conventional cigarettes is not so scary or ‘bad’.”
In her view, trying a tobacco product causes one to change
friends: “It will expose them to different kinds of kids, maybe kids that are
already using conventional cigarettes, and then they might go on to try them.”
Instead of sharing her conjecture on how e-cigarettes led 11
children to begin smoking, Dr. Watkins should have focused on the fact that 80%
of the 219 new smokers [n=175] in
her study had not previously used any tobacco product.
Odds Ratios And Numbers of Teens Smoking Cigarettes After One Year, According to Ever Tobacco Status at Baseline | ||
---|---|---|
Ever Tobacco Status- Baseline (n) | Odds Ratio | Number Smoking At One Year (%) |
Never tobacco use (9,058) | Referent | 175 (79.9) |
E-cigarettes (255) | 2.12 | 11 (5.0) |
Hookah (189) | 2.15 | 8 (3.7) |
Other combustible (114) | 3.08 | 7 (3.2) |
Smokeless tobacco (93) | 1.53 | 3 (1.4) |
Two or more products (200) | 3.81 | 15 (6.8) |
All (9,909) | 219 (100) | |
2 comments:
Once again the tobacco contra propaganda front (headquarters at UCSF) lies and manipulates data to further their persecution of smokers and vapers. They should be prosecuted for fraud and misappropriation of public (grant) funds.
I agree completely with Anonymous. Thank you Brad Rodu for your bravery in the face of powerful deceitful greedy forces, that would kill for a buck!
Post a Comment