There is fresh evidence indicating that attempts to prohibit
youth access to e-cigarettes increase youth smoking rates.
Last November, I discussed a Yale research finding that
smoking increased significantly among teens aged 12-17 in states that banned
e-cigarette sales to minors compared with states with no bans (here). Now this from researchers at Cornell
University: “We document a concerning trend of cigarette smoking among
adolescents increasing when [e-cigarettes] become more difficult to purchase.”
Michael Pesko and colleagues at the Cornell medical school
compared adolescent smoking in states that implemented e-cigarette purchasing
restrictions during the period 2007 to 2013, compared with states that had no
restrictions. Using federal Youth Risk
Behavior Surveillance System surveys, they examined smoking rates over the past
30 days: recent (smoked at least 1 day), casual (1-19 days), regular (20+ days)
and heavy (all 30 days). They also
accounted for state differences in cigarette taxes and indoor use laws, and
they included a fixed effects variable to account for additional unmeasured differences
in states’ smoking norms and anti-smoking sentiments. The study was published in Preventive Medicine (abstract here).
Pesko et al. found “…that [e-cigarette] age purchasing
restrictions are associated with a 3.1 percentage point (17.9% of the mean)
increase in adolescent cigarette use (p < 0.05) in the period of
implementation. Most of this effect is
accounted for within casual cigarette using adolescents… Our results suggest
that adolescents are willing to substitute [e-cigarettes] for cigarettes
depending on legal purchasing opportunities of [e-cigarettes].”
The researchers’ finding that e-cigs had no effect on use of
cigars, smokeless tobacco or marijuana provides confidence about the specificity
of the e-cig effect.
While the Cornell researchers do not claim that the
restrictions caused smoking to increase, they note that their results are consistent
with those of the Yale study, and they add: “All policymaking bodies should be
aware of a potential increase in cigarette use following [e-cigarette] age
purchasing restrictions.” They recommend
raising cigarette excise taxes and they endorse the Yale researchers’ support
for setting the e-cig sales age lower than the cigarette age in order to take
advantage of the substitution effect.
This is Pesko’s second notable paper this year. Earlier, he published an experimental study
(abstract here)
concluding that: “Increased taxes, a proposed US Food and Drug Administration
warning label for [e-cigarettes] and a more severe warning label may discourage
adult smokers from switching to [e-cigarettes].
Reducing the availability of flavours may reduce [e-cigarette] use by
young adult smokers.”
It is important to note that none of these studies were
funded by the National Institutes of Health.
The NIH predominantly funds researchers who endorse the federal
government’s vision of a tobacco-free society.
No comments:
Post a Comment