Chewers and Dippers: It’s the third week in February, which
means it’s time for you to be badgered by the annual Through with Chew public
relations campaign. Across the nation, tobacco
prohibitionists are publishing unscientific and unsubstantiated claims about
smokeless tobacco. Here are recent
examples from Fallon
County, Montana and Boone
County, Iowa, followed by the facts
Claim 1: “chew products deliver a higher dose of nicotine
than cigarettes, making the product more habit forming.”
The Facts: The amount of nicotine that smokeless tobacco
“delivers” is irrelevant, because chewers and dippers use products in ways that
satisfy them. In fact,
there is evidence from one of the world’s foremost authorities on nicotine
addiction that smokeless tobacco is less habit-forming than cigarettes (here
and here). Most Americans are badly misinformed about
the absence of significant health effects of nicotine (here).
Claim 2: “Smokeless ‘Spit’ tobacco contains over 2,000
chemicals.”
The Facts: Every natural product, including coffee contains
thousands of chemicals (here). A product’s chemical composition is unimportant
if it carries little or no risk. Like
coffee, smokeless tobacco fits in that category.
Claim 3: “Chew contains at least 28 chemicals that have been
found to cause cancer…”
The Facts: Almost everything we eat contains cancer-causing
chemicals, but they are in trace levels that present no risk. Again, coffee is a prime example (here). Numerous scientific studies prove that there
are vanishingly small levels of carcinogens in modern smokeless tobacco
products (here,
here,
here,
here,
here).
Claim 4: “Harmful effects of smokeless tobacco include mouth,
tongue, esophageal, and throat cancer…stomach and pancreatic cancer”
The Facts: According to dozens of published epidemiologic
studies (reviewed here),
the risks for these cancers are not elevated.
Claim 5: “Harmful effects of smokeless tobacco include increased
risk of heart disease, heart attacks and stroke.”
The Facts: Among the many risk factors for heart disease and
stroke, smoking is one of the biggest.
That is not the case with smokeless tobacco. When the American Heart Association conducted
an extensive investigation of smokeless tobacco and heart disease, it found
almost nothing (here).
Large studies from Sweden show that snus users do not have risk for
heart attacks (here)
and strokes (here),
and snus use may even offer benefits for heart attack survival (here).
Claim 6: “Harmful effects of smokeless tobacco include leukoplakia
(white sores in the mouth that can become cancer).”
The Facts: White patches are common in chewers and dippers,
but they are nearly always benign. The
link with mouth cancer is virtually zero (here).
Claim 7: “Harmful effects of smokeless tobacco include receding
gums, bone loss around the roots of the teeth, abrasion (wearing down) of
teeth.”
The Facts: There is virtually no scientific evidence that
smokeless tobacco is a risk factor for any dental problem (here,
here). In fact, one study shows that snus and moist
snuff (dip tobacco) might be protective against cavities (here).
Don’t be fooled by bogus smokeless tobacco health claims.
1 comment:
Dr brad rodu i want to thank you for your research you saved a lot of cig smokers lifes and you keep dippers and chewers really informed with truth about the product they are using im surprised research like yours didint get done sooner
Post a Comment