A Harvard School of Public Health report claims,
according to Reuters, “Most
young people in the U.S. who use newer smokeless tobacco products are smoking
cigarettes.” (here). In fact, the article, published in
Pediatrics (abstract here), contains no specific information on cigarettes.
It is common knowledge that a high proportion of U.S. smokeless tobacco (ST) users – both men and boys – also smoke, as I have previously discussed in this blog (here and here). So the main message of this study, that youth ST users are also smokers, is not new.
It is common knowledge that a high proportion of U.S. smokeless tobacco (ST) users – both men and boys – also smoke, as I have previously discussed in this blog (here and here). So the main message of this study, that youth ST users are also smokers, is not new.
The study, led by tobacco prohibitionist Dr. Gregory
Connolly, could be seen as having one purpose – to fuel the campaign against
tobacco harm reduction. The journal
article and the attendant media coverage are tainted by unscientific bias.
The authors observed that 72% of ST users also “smoke,”
a finding that the media reported as smoking cigarettes. The authors, however, defined a smoker as
anyone using any of these combustible products on one of the past 30 days: cigarettes,
cigars, pipes, bidis, kreteks, roll-your own, flavored cigarettes, clove
cigarettes, flavored cigars, or hookah/waterpipe. Results were reported for this entire group
of “combustible” products, not for cigarettes alone.
The inclusion of the other products is just one of
several tactics to maximize the percentage of ST users who smoked. Another was the definition of a tobacco user:
For all forms, it was anyone who used the product on at least one day in the past 30 – a broadly
inclusive definition.
The most disturbing part of the media coverage of
this study is the use of its results to attack tobacco harm reduction. There is nothing in these findings that is
damaging, or even relevant, to tobacco harm reduction, but it is clear that Dr.
Connolly was campaigning to insert gateway the speculation – the fictitious idea
that ST use causes smoking. I have dealt
with it previously (here). According to Reuters, Dr. Neal
Benowitz, “…who was not involved in the current research, noted that studies
have shown use of smokeless tobacco among U.S. youth can indeed be a gateway to
cigarette smoking.”
This is nonsense.
Dr. Benowitz cannot cite even one legitimate study showing that ST is a gateway
to smoking. Few cross-sectional or
longitudinal surveys in the U.S. or Sweden have specific information on the
order in which ST and cigarettes were first used – data that is required to
demonstrate that ST use causes smoking.
ST users may also smoke, but this does not mean that ST use causes
smoking. Two studies (here and here) that have examined the causal pathway document that ST use may be protective
against smoking.
Why do so many ST users smoke? Dr. Connolly’s study, ironically, gives us a
clue, as he notes that 67% of all ST users wrongly believe that all tobacco
products are equally harmful. (Ninety-two
percent of nonusers of ST share the same mistaken view.)
American children, like their parents, are routinely
misinformed about the risks of ST use and smoking. Journal reviewers and editors, as well as journalists,
should view biased and shallow research with a more critical eye.
1 comment:
Every time a person is using smokeless tobacco is a time when they are NOT smoking a cigarette.
Post a Comment