In their efforts to prevent teen smoking, tobacco control advocates
focus almost exclusively on tobacco manufacturers. For example, a CDC press release (here) for World No Tobacco Day (May 31) attributes youth tobacco use solely to
tobacco marketing. Last year’s Surgeon
General’s report (here), “Preventing Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults,” was blunt: “Advertising
and promotional activities by tobacco companies have been shown to cause the
onset and continuation of smoking among adolescents and young adults.”
Severe marketing and advertising restrictions were imposed
on manufacturers in 1998 by the Master Settlement, and again in 2009 by FDA
regulation. The industry’s role in
adolescent tobacco use stops at tobacco retail, where FDA inspections have
documented high compliance rates (here).
The other side of the equation, youth possession, is
generally ignored by the tobacco control movement. The Surgeon General’s report dismissed
possession laws because they “may distract from focusing on the role of the
tobacco industry or retailers.” But
there is a precedent for youth possession laws in alcohol control.
The 1984 National Minimum Drinking Age Act required states
to set at 21 years the minimum age for purchasing and publicly possessing
alcoholic beverages (here). States risked losing highway funds if
they did not comply; all implemented substantial penalties for first-time
possession of alcohol by underage persons, including fines, jail time, driver
license suspension and community service.
State penalties for minor possession of alcohol are shown in
the table below (from web sources here
and here). Most states levy fines – from $100
(in Delaware, Louisiana and Michigan) to $2,500 (in Illinois and Tennessee). Some 21 states have provisions for jail time,
ranging from 24 hours in Massachusetts to 12 months in Illinois, Missouri,
North Dakota, Oklahoma and Tennessee.
Eighteen states may suspend a driver’s license, from one month (in
Delaware, Maine, Nebraska, Rhode Island and Texas) to a maximum of 12 months
(in Idaho, Indiana and Utah). Nine
states can order community service.
Compare the above to the penalties for minor possession of
tobacco, shown below. (I was unable to find a consolidated web source, so I
reviewed individual state laws.) Only 22
states impose fines, and they are much smaller than those for alcohol. Only Idaho has a provision for jail time (six
months). The only other penalty, in 14
states, is community service.
I take no position on banning possession of alcohol or
tobacco by underage persons, and I am not advocating for a particular level of
punishment for offenders. However, it is
important to note that while federal and state governments have decreed that alcohol
and tobacco cannot be used by children and young adults (under 21 years and 18
years respectively), states have chosen different penalties for possession of
these substances.
Children and young adults are held responsible for possessing
alcohol, with substantial penalties for violators. In stark contrast, many states do not hold children
and young adults responsible for possessing tobacco, and those that do impose
only minor penalties.
It is time to resolve this extreme disconnect in state-based
alcohol and tobacco possession by underage individuals.
State Penalties for First-Time Alcohol Possession and Tobacco Possession By a Minor | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alcohol | Tobacco | ||||||
State | Fine ($) | DL Suspension (months) | Jail Time (months) | Other | Fine ($) | Other | |
Alabama | 50-500 | 3-6 | Up to 3 | 10-50 | |||
Alaska | Up to 600 | CS | |||||
Arizona | Up to 2,500 | 6 | Up to 100 | CS | |||
Arkansas | 100-500 | ||||||
California | 250 | CS | 75 | CS | |||
Colorado | Up to 250 | 3 | |||||
Connecticut | 200-500 | 50 | |||||
Delaware | 100 | 1 | |||||
District of Columbia | Up to 300 | 3 | 50 | ||||
Florida | Up to 500 | 2 | 25 | CS | |||
Georgia | Up to 300 | 6 | Up to 6 | CS | |||
Hawaii | 6+ | ||||||
Idaho | 1,000 | 3-12 | Up to 300 | CS, 6 months | |||
Illinois | Up to 2,500 | Up to 12 | |||||
Indiana | 2-12 | ||||||
Iowa | 200 | ||||||
Kansas | 200-500 | 25 | |||||
Kentucky | |||||||
Louisiana | Up to 100 | Up to 6 | Up to 6 | Up to 50 | |||
Maine | 200-400 | Up to 1 | 100-300 | CS | |||
Maryland | Up to 500 | ||||||
Massachusetts | Up to 0.03 | ||||||
Michigan | Up to 100 | CS | Up to 50 | CS | |||
Minnesota | 3,000 | Up to 12 | |||||
Mississippi | Up to 3 months | ||||||
Missouri | Up to 1,000 | Up to 12 | |||||
Montana | 100-300 | CS | |||||
Nebraska | Up to 500 | Up to 1 | Up to 3 | ||||
Nevada | Up to 500 | ||||||
New Hampshire | Up to 300 | Up to 100 | CS | ||||
New Jersey | 250 | 6 | |||||
New Mexico | Up to 1,000 | CS | |||||
New York | Up to 50 | CS | |||||
North Carolina | Up to 200 | CS | |||||
North Dakota | Up to 1,000 | Up to 12 | 25 | ||||
Ohio | Up to 1,000 | Up to 6 | Up to 100 | ||||
Oklahoma | Up to 500 | Up to 12 | Up to 100 | ||||
Oregon | Up to 320 | Up to 1 | |||||
Pennsylvania | Up to 300 | 3 | Up to 3 | ||||
Rhode Island | Up to 250 | Up to 1 | CS | ||||
South Carolina | 100-200 | Up to 1 | 25 | CS | |||
South Dakota | Up to 500 | up to 1 | |||||
Tennessee | Up to 2,500 | Up to 12 | |||||
Texas | Up to 500 | Up to 1 | CS | Up to 250 | |||
Utah | 1,000 | Up to 12 | Up to 6 | 60 | CS | ||
Vermont | 300 | 3 | 25 | ||||
Virginia | Up to 500 | CS | 100 | CS | |||
Washington | Up to 1,000 | Up to 3 | CS | ||||
West Virginia | Up to 500 | Up to 0.1 | 50 | CS | |||
Wisconsin | Up to 500 | ||||||
Wyoming | Up to 750 | Up to 6 | 50 | ||||
DL = Driver's License
CS = Community Service
2 comments:
Brad,
Please note that it was the alcohol industry (not public health activists) that lobbied to enact "underage drinking" laws in all 50 states with punitive penalties for youth (as a strategy to blame and scapegoat youth who did precisely what alcohol industry ads urged and still urge youth television viewers to do).
Similarly, after many of us in the public health community exposed and criticized the massive amounts of cigarette marketing to youth and worked to get the Synar law enacted in 1992, the tobacco industry responded by lobbying for laws in all 50 states to scapegoat the youth by banning youth tobacco possession and usage, while immunizing retailers (who are caught selling to youth) from prosecution as long a We Card appeared on thier door and their clerks signed a form.
Scapegoating youth for the industry's egregious actions was/is also a strategy to protect the tobacco industry from lawsuits filed by smokers who were addicted as minors.
There is no evidence that underage drinking or underage tobacco use laws have reduced youth drinking or smoking, or have even prevented even one youth from using alcohol or tobacco.
But that's because these laws were never intended to reduce youth drinking or tobacco use, but rather the were intended to protect the alcohol and tobacco industry while deceiving the public to believe otherwise.
These laws also render teen smoking
cessation programs (and probably teen alcohol cessation programs) as useless, because most of the youth who attend these programs were required to do so or else face convictions and fines.
Bill Godshall
In all likelihood, legal drinking of alcohol is equally on par with use of other illicit drugs. The fact that it's legal along with tobacco is kind of a quirk. We tried prohibition and created American organized crime. Tobacco, which is not mind altering, is just a stupid thing. But there's no law against doing stupid things.
Post a Comment