A range of public health leaders, who should know better,
have rushed to repeat and, with their stature, endorse the apparently unfounded
claim by baseball great Curt Schilling that his mouth cancer was caused by
smokeless tobacco.
Claims about cancer causation can significantly influence
national health policy; when made by recognized authorities, they should be
based on scientific and medical facts.
While I fully sympathize with Mr. Schilling, his claim of causation
has no on-the-record support from his medical team. That has not stopped the
anti-tobacco establishment from rushing to the media.
In remarks trashing smokeless tobacco, Schilling’s
oncologist, Dr. Robert Haddad of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, made no
comments specifically connecting his patient’s cancer to use of smokeless
products.
Regardless, in short order, the FDA Center for Tobacco
Products repeated Schilling’s causation claim on Twitter (here), and the presidents of the Massachusetts Medical and Dental Societies (here) and the director of the Arizona Department of Health Services (here) gave it further credence.
I don’t question Schilling’s belief that smokeless tobacco
caused his cancer. However, before
endorsing his statements, public health officials should address several points:
1. Where,
specifically, was the “mouth cancer”?
According to this National Cancer Institute monograph (here), almost all cases of mouth cancer attributable to smokeless tobacco occur in
the location where it is used. That is
also my experience in 30 years as an oral pathologist. In addition, the cases of mouth cancer that I
have seen are almost always in users of dry powdered snuff, and they occur in
the gum-cheek area. Schilling hasn’t
disclosed the location of his cancer, which he blames on moist snuff. Users of that product are not protected from
mouth cancer, but epidemiologic studies show that they are not at higher risk
than nonusers.
2. Other risk
behaviors. It can be uncomfortable, but
doctors need to know about all risk factors for oral cancer. Those at higher
risk are individuals who smoke and drink, a combination that tends to be
associated with cancers in the throat as well as the mouth. Human papillomavirus infection is an emerging
risk factor, especially for throat cancer.
Schilling disclosed that his cancer was discovered as a “lump” in his
neck; this presentation is more common with a throat cancer than a mouth
cancer. Schilling hasn’t disclosed
information on his other risk factors.
It is inappropriate for the FDA, presidents of medical
societies and other public health authorities to blindly endorse unvalidated
medical claims. Hundreds of thousands of
former smokers in the U.S. use smokeless tobacco. Dreading the prospect of getting mouth
cancer, they might be motivated by these authorities’ pronouncements to start
smoking again, not knowing that the latter significantly increases their mouth,
throat and lung cancer risks. Public
health advocates should stick to the facts, not engage in scaremongering.
2 comments:
I found it rather odd that the location of Mr. Schillings cancer was not disclosed. Had the cancer been of buccal or gingival origin, that fact would have been echoed throughout every news article. It seems almost strategic to withhold the exact location.
Just an FYI Dr. Rodu, I recently came across an article that noted Mr. Schillings cancer originated in the tonsils.
Post a Comment