New research confirms earlier findings demonstrating that
widespread snus use is tied to reduced rates of smoking.
A decade ago I worked with scientists from Sweden’s Umeå
University to publish the first scientific evidence that smokeless tobacco
(“snus” in Swedish) played an impressive role in low smoking rates among
Northern Swedish men from 1986 to 1999 (here and here). We published another study showing
that in 2004 smoking among women also declined as a result of increased snus
use (here).
I am the lead author on a new study documenting that snus
continues to play a role in low Swedish smoking rates. That work, based on 2009 data, was just published
in the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (here), with coauthors Drs. Jan-Håkan Jansson and Mats Eliasson from Umeå
University.
The chart on the left illustrates the most interesting
finding from this study: Snus continues to play a role in low smoking rates
among both men and women, but all tobacco use, including that of snus, is
declining. Critics of tobacco harm
reduction charge that snus and other safer smoke-free substitutes are a gateway
TO smoking, and thus will lead to a negative population effect. The data from Sweden is conclusive. As we wrote, “…tobacco harm reduction is not
contrary to overall reductions in tobacco use at the population level.”
We also documented the direct role snus plays in smoking
cessation. From our study: “The
prevalence of former smoking was 27% for men and 31% for women in 2009. Among
men, only 27% of former smokers were never snus users, 39% were current snus
users and 34% were former snus users. Among women former smokers, 70% never
used snus, 19% were current users and the remainder were former snus users.”
Snus’s impact was seen in the smoking quit rate, which is
the percentage of former smokers among ever smokers (current + former
smokers). “The smoking quit rate among
men was 71%; 52% were ever users of snus and 19% were never users. This was consistent with earlier surveys
(reference here). The quit rate among women was 72%, which was considerably higher than
previous years, reflecting increases in both ever users of snus (21%) and never
users (51%).”
I have noted in this blog that American policymakers insist on
population-level proof that vastly safer smoke-free products do not increase tobacco use (here and here). This study provides that proof: snus promotes low rates of smoking in Sweden and is also compatible with reductions in
all tobacco use.
2 comments:
Which is the latest year, please, for which there are generally agreed figures for: smoking prevalence in Sweden male/female, male prevalence, female prevalence; and what are those three numbers? Are they developed using the usual 'past month' method?
Thanks.
This article began with this statement: "Snus, a form of oral tobacco, has been used for over
200 years in Sweden, a country which has high quality health surveillance. It is therefore ironic that there is very little detailed information on population prevalence of snus use available from government sources." Information on smoking is also very difficult to obtain. Peter Lee has collected some useful data, available at http://www.pnlee.co.uk/ISS.htm
Post a Comment